News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Professional Software Development by ox_n on Saturday January 26, 2019 @06:23AM (#19005851)
I'm real curious how he got the rights to the image on the cover.
Re:Professional Software Development by Gys on Saturday January 26, 2019 @06:34AM (#19005882)
Its also the cover of a Joy Division lp. There might not have been a copyright.

See: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sa-visual/pop-culture-p...

Re:Professional Software Development by ox_n on Saturday January 26, 2019 @10:46AM (#19006733)
I saw a copyright on every version of that image I could find.
Re:Professional Software Development by kgwgk on Saturday January 26, 2019 @02:32PM (#19007944)
See also: https://adamcap.com/2011/05/19/the-history-of/ (mentioned in the Scientific American piece).
Re:Professional Software Development by vortico on Sunday January 27, 2019 @05:47AM (#19011230)
Pulsar data itself is likely not under copyright, but a graph of it can be under copyright protection if enough creative effort is involved. However that graph contains very little creative decision, so it would be a hard case to win if the publisher claimed ownership.
Re:Professional Software Development by iso-8859-1 on Saturday January 26, 2019 @11:00AM (#19006806)
Does it cross the threshold of originality? It is just 3d line chart. Any it hardly matters what data is actually plotted, so I assume they used something random.