https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/31/fox-news-laura...
1) Fox didn't say it; it was one host's personal Twitter comment.
2) David Hogg made himself a national media figure voluntarily
3) Criticising someone's GPA and college acceptance rate is not comparable to the hateful commentary about the Covington students.
The main thing I wonder about after reading that story is the aftermath. If eleven advertisers dropped Ingraham over that comment, how many have dropped the liberal media over their attacks on the Convington high school students?
They did so with no evidence, even though the accusation is far more specific and easily testable than it is in the Covington case. And even after being called out on it, they continued to repeat the smear against better knowledge. The difference is as clear as night & day.
https://duck.com/?q=site%3Afoxnews.com+david+hogg+paid+actor
https://duck.com/?q=site%3Afoxnews.com+david+hogg+crisis+act...
https://duck.com/?q=site%3Afoxnews.com+david+hogg+antifa
I know some crazy people said things like that, but I can't find any evidence that Fox News did.
(That's a serious question, I don't watch them and I'd like to know if they really are as bad as people say or if people just hate them because they don't agree.)