Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Workers

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by xg15 on Thursday January 24, 2019 @06:53PM (#18994254)

Well yeah. Not being able to make ends meet while working is more morally justifyable than not being to make ends meet while unemployed, I guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by skookumchuck on Thursday January 24, 2019 @07:49PM (#18994527)

Making ends meet isn't really the issue. Mentally disabled people are usually taken care of by relatives. They can't live on their own.

But they want to feel valued and do worthwhile things. By pricing them out of a job, they are denied that opportunity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by xg15 on Friday January 25, 2019 @02:26AM (#18996179)

This is a strange logic. Your description of a job is more that of a glorified hobby.

Meanwhile, are you expecting that the relatives (if they exist at all) shoulder all the burden and costs of caring themselves?

Only because someone does not live alone doesn't mean they don't have a cost of living. Indeed, a disabled person's cost of living is likely higher than an able-bodied one. Nevertheless, they should be expected to compensate this with a lower income than everyone else?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo... by skookumchuck on Friday January 25, 2019 @02:36PM (#19001619)

The trouble with your position is it renders the person unable to get a job, i.e. it makes the situation worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]