Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by billhathaway on Thursday January 24, 2019 @05:05PM
(#18993510)
Almost all the cooks/childcare providers, office support, etc are contractors not employees. A significant amount of SWE and other technical roles are contractors as well.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/25/alphabet-google-employed-mor...
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by my_username_is_ on Thursday January 24, 2019 @07:08PM
(#18994327)
The mechanism by which they get paid (W2 vs 1099) isn't important. The parent comment was listing several occupations that people fill at Google that don't fit the idea of "highly compensated software engineer" as examples of people who may be interested in organizing in search of better working conditions.
For what it's worth, I don't agree with the implication of the comment--it isn't fair to say software engineers can't have any reason to organize or protest against things that their company does.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by lrem on Thursday January 24, 2019 @06:36PM
(#18994153)
And one of the main themes of the walkout was to deal with that.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by noir_lord on Thursday January 24, 2019 @04:51PM
(#18993382)
> Not all of them can have it as nice as we do.
As nice as we do right now for a subset.
You know who companies spend a lot of time and resources trying to replace (even when it doesn't make sense)...their highest paid employees (that aren't executives, they earn their money! /s).
We get away with what we do because the number of (competent) programmers has lagged the demand for programmers since I was a kid back in the 80's.
It won't last.
- salespeople,
- tech support,
- cooks,
- childcare providers,
- all kind of office support folk,
- data entry, hmmm, technicians?
- probably many more I can't think of.
Not all of them can have it as nice as we do.