News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Scans of early RFCs.

Re:Scans of early RFCs by Regolitch on Thursday January 24, 2019 @12:41PM (#18990892)
Ha, I'm reading 'Where Wizards stay up late' and just got to the section where they first mention RFC 1.

Odd coincidence. I might have to join in on reading an RFC a day.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scans of early RFCs by taborj on Friday January 25, 2019 @09:24AM (#18998068)
That's a great book, I enjoyed it
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scans of early RFCs by jesuslop on Friday January 25, 2019 @04:43AM (#18996759)
Could take you years :-b
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scans of early RFCs by giancarlostoro on Friday January 25, 2019 @07:34AM (#18997387)
Not if you read about 25 a day, could take you less than a year, there's at least 8393 RFC's as of May 2018[0]. I'd probably focus on the major RFC's if anything.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_RFCs

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scans of early RFCs by danyork on Friday January 25, 2019 @10:39AM (#18998834)
As of this moment, there are 8,521:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index-100d.html

(The RFC Editor site is the official source for RFCs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/ )

[ Parent | on HN ]