Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by zjaffee on Thursday January 24, 2019 @03:51PM
(#18992808)
Don't forget the continued mistreatment of contract workers.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by yourbandsucks on Thursday January 24, 2019 @10:22AM
(#18989400)
Funny detail, it turns out the complaints were filed against conservative ex-googlers alleging that they were discriminated against by the progressive activist majority inside Google.
The people filing NRLB complaints probably disagree with you about the morality of all your bullet points above, and they're claiming they were discriminated against for disagreeing with the consensus.
I wonder if that changes progressives' opinions on the topic?
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by pmiller2 on Thursday January 24, 2019 @11:33AM
(#18990152)
Not my opinion. These rules are in place for the good of all workers. We need to hold on to what power we have, the right not to be retaliated against for attempting to organize being one of the most basic.
Re:Google Urged the U.S. to Limit Protection for Activist Wo...
by yourbandsucks on Thursday January 24, 2019 @12:23PM
(#18990681)
That's great for you but I'm saying that the great mass of 'progressives' who are outraged by this filing were 100% on board with firing these people in the first place.
So which is it? Speech is protected or speech should be punished?
- looking to move into China and create a censored search engine blocking offensive search terms like "human rights" [1]
- the above search engine would also tie users' searches to their phone numbers for ease of tracking
- tracking users' location on phones when tracking was set to disabled (we're back to everywhere - not just China on this one)
- looking to implement change that would disable most ad-blockers
- lobbying the government restrict employees' rights to organize against it
And this is just a list of things from the past several months. It is seriously not comprehensive. No, I think Google has quite a clear agenda, a great PR department, and a whole bunch of people in cognitive dissonance who want to believe the PR rather than acknowledge what they're taking part in.
---
edit : Added a source for first point. It's borderline unbelievable, but it was not rhetorical. Human rights (in Mandarin of course) was literally on Google's black list of terms.
[1] - https://theintercept.com/2018/09/14/google-china-prototype-l...