> The fact that you allocated a top level URL for it is embarrassing (https://cloud.google.com/twitter/). Can you imagine if Amazon advertised https://aws.amazon.com/netflix/?

It's a case study. Google didn't create a one-off URL for Twitter, but have the same URL pattern for all their public case studies:

- https://cloud.google.com/chilean-healthcare/

- https://cloud.google.com/now-ims/

- etc.

Amazon has absolutely the same, except that their URL is slightly different, but I didn't think that there is a URL police which determines which URLs are considered embarrassing for case studies and which not:

https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/netflix/