News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by StudentStuff on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @01:58AM (#18976273)
300 million monthly active users on G+ to Twitter's 335 million monthly active users, they were nearly identical in size.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google%2B#Growth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter (see sidebar)

Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by simula67 on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @02:28AM (#18976402)
Google may have been exaggerating these numbers. From https://www.blog.google/technology/safety-security/expeditin...

> Google+ currently has low usage and engagement: 90 percent of Google+ user sessions are less than five seconds

Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by ClassyJacket on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @02:03AM (#18976293)
Is that countint actual use of Google Plus or does that count anything that connects to it (comment boxes, YouTube, etc.).

Hell, the Chromecast screensaver photos are hosted on Google Plus.

Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by acdha on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @06:54AM (#18977488)
Don’t forget that they ran logins and notifications for everything through the Google+ interface and did things to juice the numbers like uncontrollable push notifications every time someone you’d ever exchanged email with joined (hi random person who bought a bookcase on Craigslist!).

The G+ numbers looked suspicious if you ran any sort of public website, where e.g. I saw metrics for referrals or shares at least an order of magnitude lower than Facebook or Twitter.

Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by chipperyman573 on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @01:58AM (#18976276)
Wow, really?? In that case, what caused G+ to fail? I was always under the impression that it was due to (low) DAUs.
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by doyoulikeworms on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @03:06AM (#18976537)
The Wikipedia article goes on to talk about G+'s very low engagement. I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter's engagement rates were somewhere near Facebook's.

> User engagement on Google+ was low compared with its competitors; ComScore estimated that users averaged just 3.3 minutes on the site in January 2012, versus 7.5 hours for Facebook.[22][23]

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google%2B#Growth)

Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by mrweasel on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @04:10AM (#18976828)
That makes you question if they actually had 300 millions "active" users.
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by ummonk on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @02:06AM (#18976307)
High MAUs doesn't necessarily translate to high DAUs.
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by jng on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @07:52AM (#18977722)
Indeed, and high DAUs doesn't translate to a high number of engaged users either. Just a 301 HTTP redirect through a domain as part of a chain can count as DAU and mean nothing.
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by kkarakk on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @02:21AM (#18976374)
yeah i visited g+ primarily for the active dev communities oriented around google products. def just once or twice a week and the activity on those "circles" was pretty slow
Re:Twitter migrates data to Google Cloud by StudentStuff on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @02:17AM (#18976356)
Slow growth/lack of user traction was what caused Google to pull the plug. Its a similar overarching problem to Twitter, but more of users being disinterested than actively repulsed due to the content the most popular users of said service post...