Re:Hemingway’s World War I savior is anonymous no more
by telesilla on Tuesday January 22, 2019 @02:46AM
(#18966692)
I ponder the reason Hemingway never mentioned him, and I imagine - which is not to excuse him - that acknowledging the person who died in your place is a trauma to be revisited. Instead of celebrating Fedele Temperini's death, it seems that Hemingway felt guilt and shame. Even though that's an easy reading of silence; I may be wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hemingway’s World War I savior is anonymous no more
by JoeAltmaier on Tuesday January 22, 2019 @10:24AM
(#18968870)
Maybe because he saw so many die, and that one more death coincident with his trauma was not any more or less important than the anonymous millions.