News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Programming Fonts – Test Drive by raphlinus on Monday January 21, 2019 @02:18AM (#18958360)
Though Inconsolata was inspired by Consolas, I wouldn't consider it all that similar. For example, the digits in Inconsolata are much closer to the Franklin Gothic model. Also, Consolas has excellent hinting for Windows, while Inconsolata was originally designed with no hinting at all. They're not drop-in replacements.
Re:Programming Fonts – Test Drive by beefsack on Monday January 21, 2019 @03:23AM (#18958699)
For those unaware, raphlinus actually created Inconsolata.
Re:Programming Fonts – Test Drive by bobwaycott on Monday January 21, 2019 @09:00AM (#18960393)
I’m a fan of Inconsolata, and it’s my daily driver in terminals and editor. Thank you.
Re:Programming Fonts – Test Drive by Jaruzel on Monday January 21, 2019 @02:54AM (#18958550)
Seconded, Inconsolata at small sizes looks awful on Windows.

I'm surprised that so many of these 'programming' fonts do not have dotted or slashed zeros. For a programming font, that's a must-have requirement for me. I edited Droid Sans Mono, so that its zero had a slash, and now I use it as my go-to font for all my IDEs and terminals. However after browsing this lot, I'm tempted to give Go Font a try.

Re:Programming Fonts – Test Drive by signal11 on Monday January 21, 2019 @01:57PM (#18962572)
Although Consolas is beautiful on Windows (and is one of my favourite monospace fonts), Inconsolata for me looks very good on Windows 10 (as I remember it didn't quite look as good on Windows 7). In fact, because the font is slightly thicker at lower font sizes, I find it easier to see and use -- so it's currently my default font in PuTTY and VS Code, for instance.

Thank you for your work on Inconsolata.