More like: resisting social change in the name of “pragmatism” is a very old pattern.
Imagine a dialogue like this before 1967: “Hey friend, I’m just being a pragmatist — interracial marriage is illegal. You could go to jail. Just break up and date someone else. Of course it’s not right, but what can you do? We have to understand that our actions have impact in the society we live within. Don’t take this to court, it’ll ruin your life.”
Without people disagreeing with this, without people disagreeing with status quo-aligned pragmatism, Loving vs Virginia would have never happened. Not would have the end of slavery, women’s suffrage, gay marriage, etc.
I appear to be the only woman to have ever spent time on the leader board of Hacker News (under a different handle).
The meaning of that is likely lost on you. Suffice it to say, it hardly supports the status quo.
This means that you seem incapable of being rational and critical of societal norms. Your independent variable is an individual, not society.
Voices like yours are well-meaning, and ultimately tools for oppression. If that sounds dramatic, just look at history.