My dog was killed on a walk with a walker ordered through Wag

Re:My dog was killed on a walk with a walker ordered through... by Sholmesy on Friday January 18, 2019 @05:39AM (#18938383)

In the interest of open discussion; what heuristic do you use to value "life"?

I use a combination of innocence, vulnerability, consciousness and intelligence.

E.g a baby life is worth more than a 40 year old's.

There's no playbook for these values, you have to decide for yourself.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:My dog was killed on a walk with a walker ordered through... by ikurei on Friday January 18, 2019 @06:06AM (#18938489)

I'm honestly curious, this topic (how people arrive at their morality) fascinates me. We would probably agree a lot (I don't eat meat mostly out of a similar logic).

Why innocence? How does innocence make a life more valuable? It's true that the kid has done nothing wrong, whereas the 40yo has sinned thoroughly, but on the other hand the kid has done nothing good for the world, and the 40yo probably has.

And vulnerability? If a high-speed train/cancer/thug is going to kill a 40yo and a toddler, how does the increased inherent vulnerability of the toddler make any difference?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:My dog was killed on a walk with a walker ordered through... by Sholmesy on Friday January 18, 2019 @07:26AM (#18938799)

Innocence and vulnerability = ability to defend themselves. There's something inherently wrong about harming something that is incapable of defending themselves. I imagine it's the same instinct that makes humans root for the underdog.

[ Parent | on HN ]