News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lego collecting delivers huge and uncorrelated market ret... by tehbeard on Thursday January 17, 2019 @07:00AM (#18930097)
I wonder how much the compatibility between sets (being able to snap blocks made in the 80's to ones from a set today) affects that, along with them having more of a "repeat use" than something like a baseball card or comic.
Re:Lego collecting delivers huge and uncorrelated market ret... by giancarlostoro on Thursday January 17, 2019 @07:34AM (#18930257)
I think that's the distinction that matters. You can collect it, and it stops being sold, now somebody somewhere wants your set in brand new condition so they can play with it, cause well they love Lego's and you've got some rare set they wish they had.
Re:Lego collecting delivers huge and uncorrelated market ret... by usrusr on Thursday January 17, 2019 @11:32AM (#18932121)
The lower bound for the price of a collectible Lego set is what you could expect when sold solely as a cheaper, slightly outmoded alternative to a new Lego set. That's better than baseball cards and the like, but still easily offset by the cost of storage and handling.
Re:Lego collecting delivers huge and uncorrelated market ret... by Zekio on Thursday January 17, 2019 @07:08AM (#18930124)
I have Lego bricks that are from the 80's and they snap together with brand new ones just fine even after being used by my parents through their childhoods and through my own
Re:Lego collecting delivers huge and uncorrelated market ret... by bena on Thursday January 17, 2019 @09:44AM (#18931072)
The Lego Group has some pretty tight tolerances for what's acceptable in a brick. For being a toy, Lego bricks are created to incredibly high standards.