News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloud Functions: Go 1.11 is now a supported language by nikki93 on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @07:49PM (#18927306)
can't your security params be read out of the binary in any case? i'm not sure how binaries offer more security.
Re:Cloud Functions: Go 1.11 is now a supported language by weberc2 on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @09:10PM (#18927694)
His post is super unclear but I think he is concerned about someone getting their hands on his source code. In general, a compiled Go binary is not trivial to reverse engineer, so there’s some security through obscurity there.
Re:Cloud Functions: Go 1.11 is now a supported language by saagarjha on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @11:57PM (#18928495)
Not a whole lot, though. A determined reverse engineer will likely be able to grab something close to your source code without much difficulty, assuming you haven't applied any wacky obfuscation.
Re:Cloud Functions: Go 1.11 is now a supported language by st3fan on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:08PM (#18927991)
Not 'someone'. Google.
Re:Cloud Functions: Go 1.11 is now a supported language by nikki93 on Thursday January 17, 2019 @08:33PM (#18936314)
Your secrets are not safe by embedding them in a binary. Compilation is not (necessarily, and at least so in the Go compiler's case) security...