News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by zaroth on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @06:07PM (#18926474)
Perhaps a pocket listing isn’t paying the Buyers Agent half of the fee, so saving 3% right there. Depending on the market that may be worth it versus going to the broad market and having to pay both sides of the commission.
Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by MertsA on Thursday January 17, 2019 @07:52AM (#18930375)
Pocket listings still pay both halves but are often discounted down to e.g. 5% instead of 6%. The agent tries to spin the situation as a discount to the buyer and seller as they "save" 1% on commission. One of the main justifications for why the agent "deserves" a 3% cut of the deal is that they are working to represent you and safeguard your interests. That can't happen when they're representing both sides. It's as perverse as a plaintiff and a defendant using the same lawyer to save 1% on legal fees.

In a given market area there are literally thousands of real estate agents. Even with a 1% discount off the top, what do you think the odds are that the best offer on the market just so happens to be a listing that your real estate agent just so happens to be the listing agent for?

Real estate is a racket.

Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by StillBored on Thursday January 17, 2019 @09:51AM (#18931128)
I get the impression the austin market is more formalized and is run more like a mini private MLS... (might be wrong), but part of the goal seems to be to keep out the discount realtors/redfin/etc.