News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by sokoloff on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @04:26PM (#18925458)
> Practically, the #1 reason to use a realtor is that if there is an issue with the home that should have been known ahead of time, there is a chain of insured entities that provides legal recourse.

Other than title insurance (which is separate from and in addition to the 5-7% commission), what's the insured risk that could possibly be worth that percentage?

Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by brightball on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @09:22PM (#18927744)
Hidden damage to the house that wasn’t found in an inspection and not disclosed by the seller. Low level water or termite damage that can’t be seen because a layer of wall was built in front of it.

Just as an example.

Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by sokoloff on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:17PM (#18928042)
How often do those issues come up and what is the typical recovery? I’d guess under 1% and maybe $25K, implying a value of $250. The commission on my house was over 200 times that figure, making for incredibly overpriced insurance if that’s the primary value the fee brings.
Re:Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commis... by brightball on Wednesday January 16, 2019 @10:21PM (#18928068)
I guess it depends on the cost of your house. Everything is relative.

You can always negotiate a flat rate with a realtor too.