SSNs were never designed for, nor intended as, identification. For years, social security cards bore the text "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" on the front.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/22/596180023/how-social-security...

My understanding is that that warning applied to the card itself, not to the number. That is, the bearer of that card has no provable relationship to the social security number on the card as it contains no attestable information (like a photograph or general description) so the card cannot be used for identification.

The number itself is of course used for identification from the beginning as a unique identifier for your "account" in the social security administration.

The problem you see with using the card itself as identification of course also applies to using the number itself as identification.

Also, the card has zero anti-forgery technology built into it. Anybody with a printer can make a near-perfect fake.

> In order to make Social Security work, the government needed a way to identify every single worker and keep track of their earnings every single year for the rest of their lives.

According to the article it seems that it was intended to be used for identification, just only for one purpose.

Exactly, so creating a government website where one can verify someone's SSN would render it useless as a password and force businesses to come up with a real solution.

There is great video about that by CGP Grey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Erp8IAUouus

Like biometrics but worse.