Voting until the result satisfies is not a solution either, IMO.

In Switzerland it is not a problem to repeat a vote, either after about ten years or if there are new circumstances justifying a re-evaluation or if the proposition has been modified to appease the opponents. Some proposals needed several retries to be accepted by the Swiss. It takes time.

I seriously think that UK should stop the process and start again. This is not undemocratic because people now know better (new circumstances justifying a re-evaluation). The process would be like this:

1. The parliament decides to cancel the process

2. A Spanish judge made a proposal how to halt the Brexit

3. An emergency committee tries to find a temporary deal with the EU

4. After a year or so, the popular vote is repeated

But you can vote to vote again. It’s all for the peoples’ will.

I don't think it's the intention of democracy to vote until you think the result is good.

If "you" is the people then why not? It's not as if governance is a static thing normally. Amendments can always be made.

Governance isn't static yes, but that doesn't excuse just voting until you like the result.

But then you're letting special interests dictate the results, if the people choose to re-vote.