My understanding is that Evan's bonus was agreed upon years in advance when Snapchat turned down FB's various offers. The investors, represented by the board, wanted him to go for a large, somewhat risky, IPO instead of taking a sure thing and incentivized Evan to do so.
If true, this should be in their S-1 SEC filing right?
It is in their S-1 (page 135): https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1564408/000119312517...
What's interesting is that these execs, including the founder/CEO got renegotiated packages just before the IPO.
Re:Snap CFO Tim Stone Is Resigning
by roymurdock on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @09:01PM
(#18917665)
there is a lawsuit pending that focuses on snapchats potential misrepresentation of instagrams size and effect on the mkt
investors should've done their own due diligence on that, what i believe is more likely is that snapchat misrepresented its user numbers pre IPO as alleged by a fired employee in 2015
investors wouldn't have cared if the stock went up, but it went down so they need to find an actual tangible way that snapchat lied to them to recoup any money from a bad bet
Their "Chief Strategy Officer" Imran Khan: $100M+
https://www.businessinsider.com/snap-ceo-evan-spiegel-cfo-im...
CEO Evan Spiegel": $637M+ (3rd highest CEO payout ever) https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/22/snap-ceo-evan-spiegel-got-...
I'm surprised there hasn't been an investor lawsuit/class action yet. The whole thing seems like a massive pump and dump scam.