I groan every time I hear someone say "both sides", as if it's just not possible for there to be a simple right answer sometimes. Remember "teach the controversy"?
Edit: not to say that pointing out that "both sides" have some sort of mistake is never valid, it's just that almost every time I see the argument it's from someone akin to a flat earther, or climate change denier, or an anti-evolutionist, who really doesn't have the facts on their side. And it's incredibly frustrating that they just expect me to respect their opinions just as much as I would respect someone who's talking points hadn't been debunked over and over already.
I agree, but I think “both sides” has merit when one side is trying to position themselves as champions of reason across the board. It simply isn’t true for any major political ideology (in America, anyway).
But you can use reason to work out that if people with different subjective values use perfect reason to choose their political opinions they will often end up disagreeing.
So it isn't true for anyone (in this universe, anyway).
Re:Ideology Impairs Sound Reasoning
by stcredzero on Monday January 14, 2019 @09:51PM
(#18908525)
It's not a fallacy in the case where something does happen to apply to both sides. As far as I am concerned, "both sides" in any debate are human beings, subject to human foibles.
It is correct in this case, but in other contexts, it is also a common bit of fallacious reasoning, used to draw false equivalences.