Re:Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or...
by darkpuma on Monday January 14, 2019 @07:55PM
(#18908020)
I'm just not seeing a meaningful distinction between forcibly taking their fingerprint ("something about them") to check against prints found on a gun and forcibly taking their fingerprint ("something about them") to check a smartphone found on the scene.
If they have a warrant to check the phone, and if taking fingerprints of the arrested without consent has already been found constitutional, I just don't see a problem.
Re:Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or...
by rocqua on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @03:46AM
(#18909706)
I'm guessing this ruling is about taking the suspects actual finger and placing it on the scanner.
This is different from building a fake finger based on fingerprints and using it to unlock your device.
Consider the password case, you can't be compelled to give your password, but the government is allowed to throw all of their hacking prowess against your device to crack that password. They can even ask you about the name of your first pet to get through security questions. Though they can't compel you to answer truly regarding the name of your first pet.
It is admittedly a weaker argument from a pure physical standpoint but the law doesn't operate based upon that anyway. Any judge would throw out a request in discovery for the defendant to produce a recording confessing their guilt even for legitimate comparative purposes and many other requests or demands that would be unduly prejudicial for 5th amendment reasons.