News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by ggm on Monday January 14, 2019 @06:53PM (#18907722)
You think HDD can't fail without warning? OK, I get that SSD don't implement S.M.A.R.T but..
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by MartijnBraam on Monday January 14, 2019 @07:01PM (#18907774)
SSDs do implement smart and usually do give an early warning.

I've destroyed a few Samsung 840 Evo drives in a few servers and didn't lose a single byte. Failure condition was a very degraded read speed. It took a few hours to copy the 120GB to a fresh SSD

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by segfaultbuserr on Monday January 14, 2019 @06:59PM (#18907759)
> I get that SSD don't implement S.M.A.R.T

Despite the S.M.A.R.T data is less predictive on SSDs, they do have it, at least for SATA disks...

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by Unklejoe on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @09:33AM (#18911320)
NVMe drives have it as well, at least the Samsung ones.

You can read it on Linux by running:

"nvme smart-log /dev/nvmeX"

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by wtallis on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @05:59PM (#18916505)
smartmontools can grab most of that info too, even on Windows.
Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by ggm on Monday January 14, 2019 @07:25PM (#18907905)
In which case, even less reason to hate on SSD for home storage in RAID shells.

I have a spun-down RAID farm as longterm. It's worrying me that the unit the disks are in is a SPARC based motherboard now over 10 years old. Those caps don't last forever.

Re:SSD Storage: 2018 in review by Fronzie on Tuesday January 15, 2019 @12:05PM (#18912673)
and the magnetized bits on an HDD have an expected livetime of 25 years. Unless read-and-rewritten every so many years