Re:The potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth e...
by danmaz74 on Friday January 11, 2019 @10:03AM
(#18883968)
Just for the sake of discussion, I'll say that sending anything into space also creates a lot of pollution on Earth (just think about all the energy necessary to build and power our rockets). Mining asteroids would still have an ecological impact - higher, lower, I don't know. But something to keep in mind.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth e...
by sillyquiet on Friday January 11, 2019 @10:09AM
(#18884011)
This is very true, but my thinking is that cost is almost all front-loaded - once we get equipment up there to accomplish the mining, the launches in support would not be terribly frequent, I think, right?
Re:The potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth e...
by danmaz74 on Friday January 11, 2019 @01:04PM
(#18885403)
That's possible, depending on how much fuel will the operation consume when in space - and where it will come from. At the moment, I think we would need to send the fuel to move all cargo from Earth. Being able to create it directly in space would change everything, of course.
Re:The potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth e...
by pvaldes on Friday January 11, 2019 @04:26PM
(#18887238)
Land ecosystems had evolved with a fair amount of change. They can recover also much faster because they are "high energy" machines. In the mud you have a lot of hidden structure that is basic for the marine living things inhabiting those ecosystems. Just stirring the mud you can kill a lot of the biomass. And there is the anoxic nasty stuff also that would poison the area.