Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by _mischief on Thursday January 10, 2019 @07:19AM
(#18873322)
> real offline alternatives
How about https://tiddlywiki.com/ ?
Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by mcless on Thursday January 10, 2019 @07:53AM
(#18873465)
I thought the parent comment was referring to real offline journals made of treeware.
Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by sandrobfc on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:36AM
(#18873682)
Exactly. It's not that I don't see value in online alternatives, but in this case, if the main point is to access it offline, I don't see how different it is from a physical journal.
Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by _mischief on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:55AM
(#18873797)
Why use digital formats offline:
- editing and reordering text
- attachments
- aesthetics
- accessibility
- hassle/weight optimisation
Aesthetics includes theming, and also not everyone has good handwriting.Accessibility, because not everyone is able to hand-write in the first place.
Weight optimisation, because if a laptop is non-negotiable, going digital means one less thing to remember about and carry with you.
I have multiple physical notebooks/calendars and a digital commonplace book, they all have their place.
Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by developit on Thursday January 10, 2019 @02:44PM
(#18877331)
For slow writers but quick typists, an app is always going to win out over a physical journal. Also interested in an event call export + parse.
Re:Show HN: JournalBook – Privacy centric, offline first, pe...
by fiala__ on Thursday January 10, 2019 @07:25AM
(#18873350)
Many years ago I used Omm for a bit, it's pretty good if you really want to concentrate https://ommwriter.com/
Except for the way in which you write and access JournalBook, how is it different from a real journal that we can carry everywhere?