Re:Google transformed Mountain View, is San Jose next?
by techsupporter on Wednesday January 09, 2019 @11:27PM
(#18871519)
> They have a liking for different kind of city and that's alright. We don't have to like living in the same kinds of places. There is no reason to downvote on personal opinion on something.
Because amyjess is using the same kind of brash language and tactics that aren't appreciated when people crap on "the flyover states" or "backwater redneck states." Slagging on an entire class of anything--whether states that happen to be located in the Midwest or cities that happen to be dense--isn't a good way to have a conversation. Nor is throwing in that California is a "nanny state," which is often perceived as coded language for "government run by Democrats."
Had amyjess stuck with professing a preference for a sprawling suburb and left it at that, without also taking shots at other people's preferences, I would agree with you.
Re:Google transformed Mountain View, is San Jose next?
by rrdharan on Thursday January 10, 2019 @12:41AM
(#18871783)
Sprawling suburbs impose externalities on the planet:
https://inhabitat.com/how-american-urban-sprawl-causes-probl...
They have a liking for different kind of city and that's alright. We don't have to like living in the same kinds of places. There is no reason to downvote on personal opinion on something.
I'd like to see SJ get built up a bit more to look like a traditional city, but they don't. I don't have a problem with that. They're not even trying to impose their values on SJ --they chose to live in a place that shares their values.