News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The LaTeX fetish (2016) by _emacsomancer_ on Wednesday January 09, 2019 @01:40PM (#18867388)
> But the notion that Word is some kind of underpowered little toy no real author should ever possibly use is just, well, wrong.

I wouldn't characterise it as underpowered so much as wrongly-powered. Just the ability to use macros etc. is not the same as being a real text editor.

I actually started out using word processors, and really wish I had discovered proper text editors sooner. For me, word processors are just miserable working environments.

Re:The LaTeX fetish (2016) by zapzupnz on Wednesday January 09, 2019 @03:45PM (#18868682)
This isn't me trying to convince you of anything, just adding some anecdata.

I find Word a miserable working environment. On the other hand, I find Pages a delight to work in. It's one of those "it just works" programs for me, and I find documenting editing so easy and intuitive.

It reminds me of those who swear by WordPerfect and wouldn't dream of using Word unless forced to; it's not the class of application they care about it; it's the specific set of tools, their presentation, and how the app matches their work habits.

(Same reason that I just can't use Google Docs, no matter how many workplaces make its use a soft requirement)