News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by nugget on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @04:33PM (#18859925)
Soy contains phytoestrogens which certain populations (e.g. women pregnant with male fetuses) may be advised to reduce intake of or avoid. Something to keep in mind as meat replacements become more popular - that it may not be a one-size-fits-all solution.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by aoner on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @05:28PM (#18860383)
I recently looked into the literature and I think the evidence is ambiguous [1] If you've found some clear evidence supporting your case, could you point me in the right direction?

[1]https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shourong_Shi/publicatio...

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by sc4les on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @05:18PM (#18860306)
Complete bogus, please abstain from spreading this misinformation. Unlike animal products which contain actual hormones active in humans plant products have an negligible effect and you would have to consume impossible amounts for the smallest of effects. Further, phytoestrogens actually benefit humans
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by Rebelgecko on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @07:40PM (#18861283)

  ...you would have to consume impossible amounts for the smallest of effects

  Further, phytoestrogens actually benefit humans
Maybe I'm not parsing things well, but these 2 statements seem contradictory.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by devmunchies on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @08:49PM (#18861621)
From what I understand, the phytoestrogens take the place of real mammalian estrogen, but our bodies don't process it like real estrogen, so its actually good for men who want less estrogen. It acts almost like an estrogen blocker.

Whereas drinking cow's milk, for example, is high in estrogen because its from it comes from a large female after giving birth.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by null000 on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @08:41PM (#18861582)
Not contradictory, but working to different ends.

"You shouldn't worry about this because phytoestrogens aren't present"

"You shouldn't worry about this because phytoestrogens are beneficial"

Both can be true at once, and support the end argument, it's just not particularly helpful or harmful if both are true at the same time.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by rthomas6 on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @05:19PM (#18860312)
I mean, that's true with meat, too.
Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by ianai on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @08:38PM (#18861576)
The estrogen in beef is actual, mammalian estrogen. Which would you expect your body to interact most within digestion? Of course it’s going to be the stuff that’s closest to it.

The FUD being spread around soy is ridiculous.

Other nutrients that tend to be harder to find in plants than animals also tend to be more poorly absorbed than their animal counterparts. B12, iron, d, zinc, etc.

Re:Meat-free 'Impossible Burger 2.0' tastes even closer to t... by tropo on Tuesday January 08, 2019 @09:57PM (#18861903)
I would not expect a better reaction from actual, mammalian estrogen. It doesn't work that way with opioids: carfentanyl is a whole lot more powerful than dynorphins, enkephalins, endorphins, endomorphins and nociceptin.

Also, quantity matters. Plants might produce a lot more than mammals do.

In any case, the breast growth on males is no joke. That is just the affect on adults, who are far less susceptible than babies. However it works, soy is a serious hazard and should have the GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status removed.