News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Indefinite storage of solar power via MIT by davidj on Monday November 08, 2010 @11:57PM (#1885382)
Won't work. In the last sentence they basically admit wishful thinking. Can we quit voting up faith-based science articles?

“to use a combination of simulation, chemical intuition, and databases of tens of millions of known molecules to look for other candidates that have structural similarities and might exhibit the same behavior.”

Re:Indefinite storage of solar power via MIT by tbrownaw on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @08:53AM (#1886380)
"We learned something interesting, and now we're going to go find out if its easily practically useful or currently just a curiosity."

I don't see how that's "wishful thinking" or "faith-based" or anything like that.

Re:Indefinite storage of solar power via MIT by zshahan on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @08:56AM (#1886385)
i think the important point, as discussed in the comments at the top, is that they had a genuine knowledge breakthrough. for those of us wishing for immediate technological change, it may not sound like a lot, but for the scientists who have been working on this issue for decades, it is huge. & yes, we don't know yet, but hopefully it will lead to something more soon.