Re:Women on the pill don't 'need' to have simulated periods?...
by burfog on Monday January 07, 2019 @02:04PM
(#18848743)
Say what? How does my 4th paragraph mean I think "it is all about money and parents own needs"?
The man is suffering. Just as if his child had been wrongfully killed, we can't fix things with money but that is normally how our law would work. It's the best we can do for the loser.
Flipping things around from our legal norm, as is done with children, is simply pouring salt into his wounds.
If child-raising is such work and annoyance (your 2nd paragraph), then let the other parent (father normally) have the kid. Oh, but giving up that sweet child support money... it sounds like you are the one for whom "it is all about money and parents own needs".
The man is suffering. Just as if his child had been wrongfully killed, we can't fix things with money but that is normally how our law would work. It's the best we can do for the loser.
Flipping things around from our legal norm, as is done with children, is simply pouring salt into his wounds.
If child-raising is such work and annoyance (your 2nd paragraph), then let the other parent (father normally) have the kid. Oh, but giving up that sweet child support money... it sounds like you are the one for whom "it is all about money and parents own needs".