Re:An Open Letter to Apple Computer, Inc.
by spike021 on Monday November 08, 2010 @07:44PM
(#1884769)
Unfortunately, there are several reasons why Apple would think to prohibit its users from installing system-level "hacks" (as they would call them) or plugin extensions. The most "important" or foremost of which being that which will allow piracy. I am not endorsing Apple's closed system model, but simply stating one of its reasons. Deny it or not, such plugins can and will exist and as long as such are active, this will be a problem. I know, piracy is a completely different subject, but it's a reasonable issue affecting Apple's decision IMHO. I do have to say that the PRIMARY reason why I jailbroke was in order to add nonexistent functionality through add-ons. Heck, it's the same reason why I "hacked" my PSP so many years ago. I like having freedom to change certain settings, the kind of which that won't affect anybody else but me, and I am definitely taking the risk. As long as Apple uses an App Store model, it's as you say saurik. There will still be restrictions because Apple will be the middleman. As long as somebody is in control of any one thing, they will take the steps necessary to enforce their beliefs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The issue with piracy is because Apple lets their DRM be cracked by just running gdb on the encrypted processes (while running) -- if they put any effort into it (kernel level blocks, etc) they could make security possible even with these hacks.
Re:An Open Letter to Apple Computer, Inc.
by spike021 on Monday November 08, 2010 @08:16PM
(#1884853)
Right, and being on the receiving end of money transfer, Apple would not allow such software to exist as it would not only reduce sales for developers, but also percentage revenue for itself as well. Apple will always have some sort of fear in regards to safety, but money-watch will be at the top of it's most important worry list. Customer safety is a given as well, however there would be nothing wrong with Apple allowing some sort of choice where customers would have the option of deciding whether or not they want to allow extension software. This leads back to the aforementioned statement; Apple's primary concern is its revenue, just like with any business.
Re:An Open Letter to Apple Computer, Inc.
by saurik on Tuesday November 09, 2010 @12:34PM
(#1887175)
This premise is flawed because the App Store doesn't make much money: that service is provided in order to make the hardware they sell more profitable. Meanwhile, the people who pirate are quite unlikely to actually buy it. Trust me: if Apple cared even $10,000 a year about piracy (one engineer for a month) it would be very easy for them to keep on top of the people who are doing it.