News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Overloaded Soldier: Why U.S. Infantry Now Carry More ... by Balero on Monday January 07, 2019 @05:52AM (#18844244)
There has been an order of magnitude less casualties in both Iraq(4,424) and Afghanistan(1,856), than in Vietnam (58,220).
Re:The Overloaded Soldier: Why U.S. Infantry Now Carry More ... by skh on Monday January 07, 2019 @06:49AM (#18844457)
I agree with the overall point of your post but one should count contractor deaths. My understanding is that the U.S. military is much more reliant on contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan than in Vietnam.
Re:The Overloaded Soldier: Why U.S. Infantry Now Carry More ... by pmorici on Monday January 07, 2019 @07:08AM (#18844550)
Even including contractors there was still an order of magnitude more casualties in Vietnam.
Re:The Overloaded Soldier: Why U.S. Infantry Now Carry More ... by skh on Monday January 07, 2019 @07:30AM (#18844653)
Do you have numbers on contractor deaths? I’ve not seen them. I’m not disputing that Vietnam involved many times more deaths for Americans. Just stating that one should include contractor deaths since the U.S. military decided to contract out so much of its war effort.
Re:The Overloaded Soldier: Why U.S. Infantry Now Carry More ... by pmorici on Monday January 07, 2019 @08:14AM (#18844831)
Low hundreds if you only consider American citizens. There is some info on Wikipedia but it hasn’t been updated in a few years.

Thing is there were also a lot of contractors in Vietnam just not the Blackwater type that gets a lot of the press in this era.