News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Threema – Seriously secure messaging by dbrgn on Sunday January 06, 2019 @04:12PM (#18840739)
Even under the revised BÜPF, the government has no power to ask for backdoors. They can only ask for data that is already stored (which is very little metadata in the case of Threema, since collecting as little data as technically possible is the guiding principle for Threema).

More information can be found in the transparency report: https://threema.ch/en/transparencyreport

(Disclaimer: Threema dev)

Re:Threema – Seriously secure messaging by iforgotpassword on Sunday January 06, 2019 @06:40PM (#18841505)
Since you outed yourself: does your company have an official stance on 3rd party clients?
Re:Threema – Seriously secure messaging by dbrgn on Monday January 07, 2019 @04:10AM (#18843841)
I can't give you any official answer (I'm here privately and don't speak for the company), but the terms of use of Threema don't disallow reverse engineering. As long as third party clients don't actively undermine the business model or trademarks, this shouldn't be a problem. In doubt, just send an e-mail to info@.

After all, https://openmittsu.de/ is a thing. (Note that the developer of OpenMittsu does not offer the option of generating an identity in the software itself, instead you generate an identity on your phone and then transfer it to OpenMittsu through an ID backup.)

(Edit: Almost forgot: The "Threema Web protocol" has also been officially documented: https://threema-ch.github.io/app-remote-protocol/ I would love to see alternative clients that implement it, to allow using your Threema app from other platforms.)