News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diet hacker data point by byrneseyeview on Monday November 08, 2010 @02:56PM (#1883733)
As someone who is eating a delicious, olive oil-doused salad right now, I have to interject: your calorie sources do affect your weight gain, albeit indirectly: if you're getting most of your energy from carbs, you'll consistently crave food a few hours after eating. If you get the majority of your calories from protein and fat, you'll get over this.

I consume a lot of fat and protein: two or three dozen eggs per week, fatty red meat for most dinners, olive oil-soaked salads for lunch, etc. This has led to significant weight loss, as well as a substantial energy boost. As this is (fairly) close to the diet that humans evolved to consume, it's not especially surprising that it works.

Re:Diet hacker data point by coffee on Monday November 08, 2010 @03:26PM (#1883843)
You're missing the point.

You are stating that if one eats the "correct types" of food, one will lose weight.

Not true.

You can eat to many calories of the "correct types" of food and still gain weight.

The article discusses a man eating Twinkies, yet still lost weight. You're saying you eat fatty red meats, yet still lost weight.

The Twinkies guy, as well as you, have lost weight because you're in a calorie deficit, regardless of the "types" of food you're eating.

Re:Diet hacker data point by mikeklaas on Monday November 08, 2010 @04:29PM (#1884085)
His point was that eating less carbs leads to eating less total calories (through suppression of appetite). He didn't claim that eating two different foods comprising the same # of calories lead to different amount of weight loss.