Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Initialization in C++ is Seriously Bonkers. Parent comment
``` If an object that has static or thread storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
- if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
- if it has arithmetic type, it is initialized to (positive or unsigned) zero;
- if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits;
- if it is a union, the first named member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits; '''
I think that covers every possible value you can create, and it seems pretty non-indeterminate by my reading.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
``` If an object that has static or thread storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
- if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
- if it has arithmetic type, it is initialized to (positive or unsigned) zero;
- if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits;
- if it is a union, the first named member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits; '''
I think that covers every possible value you can create, and it seems pretty non-indeterminate by my reading.