Re:Ask HN: What is your favorite RFC?
by avianauthor on Sunday January 06, 2019 @09:44AM
(#18838542)
To LinuxBender: RFC2549 also clarified the key words:
MUST Usually.
MUST NOT Usually not.
SHOULD Only when Marketing insists.
MAY Only if it doesn't cost extra.
Re:Ask HN: What is your favorite RFC?
by LinuxBender on Friday January 04, 2019 @02:45PM
(#18827053)
RFC-6919 [1] The key words "MUST (BUT WE KNOW YOU WON'T)", "SHOULD CONSIDER", "REALLY SHOULD NOT", "OUGHT TO", "WOULD PROBABLY", "MAY WISH TO", "COULD", "POSSIBLE", and "MIGHT" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 6919.
Re:Ask HN: What is your favorite RFC?
by Something1234 on Friday January 04, 2019 @01:06PM
(#18826178)
I'm working on writing a paper for a class on the DNS system. I really like rfc1035 [1]. It describes the goals, and terms involved. Also it goes into details on their design tradeoffs, and how they made it distributed.
Unfortunately many orgs either don't have these mailboxes set up, or they aren't actively monitored.
[1] - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6919
[1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
"There is persistent delivery retry, until the carrier drops."
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2468