News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenSCAD: Software for creating solid 3D CAD objects by hjek on Thursday January 03, 2019 @04:09AM (#18813810)
> OpenSCAD is much, much harder to use,

> What would you suggest? Complaining is easy.

What are the complaints about OpenSCAD? If it's the language itself, then there's some similar projects using Racket[0] and JavaScript[1] respectively.

[0]: https://docs.racket-lang.org/ruckus/Ruckus_Language_Referenc...

[1]: https://openjscad.org/

Re:OpenSCAD: Software for creating solid 3D CAD objects by StavrosK on Thursday January 03, 2019 @04:32AM (#18813895)
Mainly the language and the lack of immediate feedback, along with the fact that it's more verbose than the point-and-click interface of Fusion. I will try out the Python version, though, it sounds interesting.
Re:OpenSCAD: Software for creating solid 3D CAD objects by hjek on Thursday January 03, 2019 @05:02AM (#18814033)
> I will try out the Python version,

I don't think there's a Python version, unless you count using Ruckus via Python on Racket[0].

> lack of immediate feedback

When "Automatic Reload and Preview" is enabled, OpenSCAD re-renders the shape whenever the text file is saved, so there's hardly any time delay, although there is arguably a spacial remoteness due to the text being separate from the shape.

> along with the fact that it's more verbose than the point-and-click interface of Fusion.

I personally find it difficult manipulating 3D objects by with a 2D cursor. I've spent a fair amount of time on the point-and-click editor in Blender, and I find it less confusing to have a textual expression of the shapes at hand.

Perhaps the one (possibly accidental) killer-feature about OpenSCAD is that it works well with external editors, such as vim.

[0]: https://github.com/pedropramos/PyonR