Re:Courier Prime: It’s Courier, Just Better
by whoisjuan on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:44AM
(#18804623)
Yeah. I read that part, but I didn't know about the idiosyncrasies behind the use of the font, so it wasn't fully clear to me why was important in this industry to heavily rely on a particular font.
Also, read the HN guidelines. Comments like this degrade the quality of the discussions. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re:Courier Prime: It’s Courier, Just Better
by munificent on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:12AM
(#18804318)
It does, but it's easy to underestimate how important this is to the film industry.
Re:Courier Prime: It’s Courier, Just Better
by _underflow_ on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:57AM
(#18805864)
As a non-seasoned complete outsider, I thought this part of the article was somehow being dryly facetious or sarcastic or something.
Kinda good to have somebody to provide context, actually.
Re:Courier Prime: It’s Courier, Just Better
by asjo on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @11:27AM
(#18807332)
So there were no screenplays before 1956? (When the Courier typeface was created.)
Re:Courier Prime: It’s Courier, Just Better
by blacksmith_tb on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:23PM
(#18809814)
I would think they were typed on manual typewriters (so the tradition of using Courier probably stems from those days).
"Since the beginning, screenplays have been written in Courier. Its uniformity allows filmmakers to make handy comparisons and estimates, such as 1 page = 1 minute of screen time."