Re:EU to fund bug bounty programs for open-source projects
by Jonnax on Sunday December 30, 2018 @06:55AM
(#18788714)
There's barely any development on the GitHub. And also it seems like there are few contributers.
Whilst KDE is a much bigger project that is actively developed.
Re:EU to fund bug bounty programs for open-source projects
by qha on Sunday December 30, 2018 @07:21AM
(#18788805)
If that's your indicative of the quality of a project then I understand your position.
Re:EU to fund bug bounty programs for open-source projects
by coldtea on Sunday December 30, 2018 @07:30AM
(#18788841)
First, being abandoned for new development is a great indication of the quality of a project.
Second, you haven't given us any arguments for your "indications of quality" regarding MATE and KDE.
Third, like Gnome, KDE has a huge legacy in FOSS, and is a great project in itself based on a top notch GUI backend. Some of its code even went on and become the basis of the modern web (KHTML -> Webkit -> Blink -> Node -> now also Edge), other tools like KDevelop, Krita, etc are among the best in class in what they do.
What are you, some teenage Linux nerd, with a "favorite" desktop to promote in flame wars?
Re:EU to fund bug bounty programs for open-source projects
by gronne on Sunday December 30, 2018 @07:48AM
(#18788917)
And I who thought the KDE/Gnome wars was over.
I'm not going to say that the project failed entirely because of technical reasons, but at first glance it really looks like they took bad decisions. It's hard to defend a move where you end up with worse software and a worse experience for users, no matter how much money you save.