Re:PayPal has permanently banned The Hacker News and hold fu...
by timthorn on Saturday December 29, 2018 @01:05PM
(#18784828)
> need for the card issuer to provide protection is not as necessary
It is a legal responsibility upon the issuer, rather than a discretionary benefit. It is particularly beneficial when a retailer goes out of business; an undelivered or broken order will be refunded, whereas if the bill was paid by debit card you'd just be considered a creditor.
It is a legal responsibility upon the issuer, rather than a discretionary benefit. It is particularly beneficial when a retailer goes out of business; an undelivered or broken order will be refunded, whereas if the bill was paid by debit card you'd just be considered a creditor.