News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by dforrestwilson on Friday December 28, 2018 @10:18AM (#18777181)
The same guy who encouraged Elizabeth Holmes to ignore her engineers in favor of over the top promotion. Also a board member who failed (or chose not) to detect the underlying fraud...

Every time I consider closing out my Tesla short position something like this happens and I get more confident that something is awry.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by porpoisely on Friday December 28, 2018 @10:51AM (#18777398)
I'm no fan of Ellison or Oracle. But a guy worth $60 billion with decades long ties and influence in media and government investing in TSLA and serving on its board is not something that should make shorts happy.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by notacoward on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:08AM (#18777534)
Considering that ORCL has under-performed NASDAQ over the last five years, I'm not sure it would make long investors happy either.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by khafra on Friday December 28, 2018 @01:48PM (#18778607)
It doesn't make me want to short Tesla stock. But it does make me want to short my likelihood of owning a Tesla product.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by ryanmarsh on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:16AM (#18777597)
This. It’s not surprising at all how emotional and “short” sighted people are being about Ellison because “Oracle sucks”.

I despise Oracle as much as the next guy but if I were in Elon’s shoes I’d want Ellison on my board. The car business is tough, really tough. At one point the database business was really tough. Ellison achieved a near monopoly. Despite our views on the quality his software. Tech people were not his customers, CIO’s were. He gave them exactly what they wanted.

Ellison is shrewd, not stupid. Churning out shit cars would be stupid. Helping Elon cut waste and increase sales would be shrewd. Perhaps Ellison, if anything, could temper Elon’s boundless optimism and pet projects.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by sanderjd on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:30AM (#18777703)
It seems to me that you just made the argument for the opposition. We know that Ellison was successful in a business that involved selling big contracts to a small number of purchasers spending from a budget of company or taxpayer money. But that's not Tesla's business. Does Ellison know how to sell to individuals spending large amounts of their own money on a product with lots of similar competitors? Maybe? But he doesn't have a track record of doing that.

The retort here might be that people who have a track record of being "good at business" are good at all business. I personally don't buy that. I think too much executive decision-making is guesswork based on pattern-matching to prior experience for that to hold; if you have no prior experiences with a matching pattern, you're no more or less qualified than the next smart person making it up as they go.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by ryanmarsh on Friday December 28, 2018 @12:47PM (#18778210)
I think too much executive decision-making is guesswork based on pattern-matching to prior experience

Well now we’re just tossing back and forth our own biases and hypothesis. I understand your point. It makes sense. Not sure I agree.

The only thing I would add is, cars are big purchases for people. Oracle was a big purchase for CIO’s. Don’t forget for a second that Oracle was sold to a person. Talk to some Oracle sales people about this. I think you’ll find it similar to car sales in many ways.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by cat199 on Friday December 28, 2018 @04:41PM (#18779673)
> Does Ellison know how to sell to individuals spending large amounts of their own money on a product with lots of similar competitors?

are you buying a battery-backed electric power storage substation?

didn't think so..

tesla isn't just about cars

which isn't to say i like musk or ellison

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by sanderjd on Friday December 28, 2018 @05:06PM (#18779841)
Hmm, that's a good point. I'm definitely more bullish on their power storage business, so if Ellison pushes them further that direction since it's more similar to the kind of business he knows, then maybe that's a good idea. Maybe Tesla is also big enough at this point to support multiple divisions with different customer bases and business models.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by microtherion on Friday December 28, 2018 @02:08PM (#18778738)
As far as I can tell, the positive qualities that Ellison could bring to the table (sales skills, toughness) are ones that Musk largely already has, and, what's more worrying, it seems likely that Ellison will enable the character flaws in Musk that the two share (hyperbole, unscrupulousness).

Meanwhile, Ellison adds nothing I can see in terms of manufacturing and and little in terms of adult leadership.

I would argue that the ideal director in terms of complementary skills would be somebody like Tim Cook (even though Tim himself would probably be too likely to have conflicts of interest to serve).

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by darkpuma on Friday December 28, 2018 @08:04PM (#18780918)
I wager Tim Cook would probably be far better for Tesla than he has been for Apple.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by genie514 on Friday December 28, 2018 @10:41AM (#18777329)
This guy built a company that services most of the data infrastructure of the world and pumps 15 billion of cash every year- but you remember him by what advice he gave to one person ; that just seems unfair.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by kerng on Friday December 28, 2018 @02:32PM (#18778868)
Oracle does not serve most of the data infrastructure anymore. That is a thing of the past. They are struggling terribly and it probably will get worse considering how the big 3 cloud providers move successfully forward and Oracle loses ground daily.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by drawkbox on Friday December 28, 2018 @06:31PM (#18780356)
Larry Ellison thought the cloud was a "fashion driven" software buzzword fad in 2008 [1][2], a miss as big as Ballmer with the iPhone. The cloud will ultimately probably kill off Oracle.

> The Oracle chief executive told shareholders at the company's annual meeting Friday that the technology is a fad that doesn't have a clear business model, despite the fact that Google , Microsoft and practically every other tech company is singing its praises.

> "I think it's ludicrous that cloud computing is taking over the world," Ellison told about 100 shareholders who attended the meeting at the software maker's headquarters. "We think it's very hard to make money in this thing."

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FacYAI6DY0 [2] https://www.forbes.com/2008/10/10/ellison-cloud-computing-te...

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by bdcravens on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:21AM (#18777634)
Given Tesla's recent issues, it seems unfair to judge someone on financial success alone while turning a blind eye to ethics implications.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by enraged_camel on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:09AM (#18777539)
Applauding Oracle only makes sense if you believe ends justify the means.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by burtonator on Friday December 28, 2018 @11:48AM (#18777830)
This was my thinking... Ellison spend the early part of Oracle's career overselling, then locking people into a product which they were now stuck with using. It also had the double impact of pricing out honest competitors.

One of the BIGGEST things we need to do is STOP punishing honest companies and politicians.

In the 2008 financial crisis we BAILED OUT banks who basically gambled.

Banks who were honest didn't benefit by being honest. They should have been able to buy up the entire industry at a penny.

The political system has the same issue now. Trump lies and the GOP continues to support him. Honest politicians lose because people want to be told what they already "know" not hard truths.

Their position on coal is a good example.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by TheRealDunkirk on Friday December 28, 2018 @09:46PM (#18781433)
> In the 2008 financial crisis we BAILED OUT banks who basically gambled.

There was no "gambling." The system was rigged, and the bailout proved that the rigging went all the way to the top.

Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by roguecoder on Friday December 28, 2018 @07:04PM (#18780519)
It's impressive how if we just took women's allegations of sexual assault seriously we would also employ a lot less incompetent, over-compensated rich men to jobs they are terrible at.
Re:Tesla Adds Larry Ellison and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as ... by Im_Unlucky on Friday December 28, 2018 @10:33AM (#18777273)
Have opened and closed a tesla short multiple times and it only ever frustrates me more each time. I'm hoping this bear market will push it down where it should be for once and all.