News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016) by verdverm on Wednesday December 26, 2018 @09:03PM (#18766678)
GP in general needs something like Tensorflow and a standard set of benchmarks
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016) by __lm__ on Thursday December 27, 2018 @06:42AM (#18768919)
The fact that there is no standard set of benchmarks was recognised some years ago:

https://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/papers/gecco12benchmarks3.pdf

http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/wjaskowski/archives/wp-publicati...

While I think that the situation is improving, we are still far from a common set of benchmarks used by the entire GP community.

Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016) by joe_the_user on Thursday December 27, 2018 @01:42AM (#18767876)
Well it needs something, it seems.

The article looks like an interesting approach but it gives every impression of being a "cul-da-sac", an effort that wasn't followed up on. Google scholar shows this article cited by four other articles - and those article not cited by anything more.

Some way of figuring out what articles matter in GP would be very useful.

Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016) by randomsearch on Thursday December 27, 2018 @03:22AM (#18768262)
gpbenchmarks.org ?
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016) by verdverm on Friday December 28, 2018 @09:08AM (#18776760)
That's ok, there was a paper from Gecco2012, I think, GP needs better benchmarks.

Differential Equations and PDEs would be a good option too.