Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016)
by verdverm on Wednesday December 26, 2018 @09:03PM
(#18766678)
GP in general needs something like Tensorflow and a standard set of benchmarks
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016)
by __lm__ on Thursday December 27, 2018 @06:42AM
(#18768919)
The fact that there is no standard set of benchmarks was recognised some years ago:
https://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/papers/gecco12benchmarks3.pdf
http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/wjaskowski/archives/wp-publicati...
While I think that the situation is improving, we are still far from a common set of benchmarks used by the entire GP community.
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016)
by joe_the_user on Thursday December 27, 2018 @01:42AM
(#18767876)
Well it needs something, it seems.
The article looks like an interesting approach but it gives every impression of being a "cul-da-sac", an effort that wasn't followed up on. Google scholar shows this article cited by four other articles - and those article not cited by anything more.
Some way of figuring out what articles matter in GP would be very useful.
Re:Differentiable Genetic Programming (2016)
by randomsearch on Thursday December 27, 2018 @03:22AM
(#18768262)
gpbenchmarks.org ?