News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Domain Registrar Can Be Held Liable for Pirate Site, German Court Rules. Parent comment

Re:Domain Registrar Can Be Held Liable for Pirate Site, Germ... by walrus01 on Monday December 24, 2018 @01:28PM (#18753467)
Medium sized AS backbone network operations speaking: nobody takes this seriously, and not one of more than a hundred individual ISPs we peer with uses opennic. It's dismissed as a bunch of dilettantes by people I know who run DNS services relied upon by millions of customers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Domain Registrar Can Be Held Liable for Pirate Site, Germ... by move-on-by on Monday December 24, 2018 @02:32PM (#18753826)
That’s fine and everyone is entitled to their opinions. But my point is that it’s an alternative root nameserver that anyone can choose to use without the need of starting their own ISP or breaking the current system. The technology exists and it’s been up and running for a while now. The seriousness of it all and whether or not important people dismiss the technology is a moot point.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Domain Registrar Can Be Held Liable for Pirate Site, Germ... by Konryan on Monday December 24, 2018 @02:00PM (#18753664)
What's their issue with it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Domain Registrar Can Be Held Liable for Pirate Site, Germ... by walrus01 on Monday December 24, 2018 @03:18PM (#18754064)
As I understand it, their issue is that it's not relevant for their customer base (nobody has requested access to the weird non ICANN top level domains), and it risks balkanizing the established single global Internet into things that can't talk to each other.

Essentially the same problem as if people started picking random non-RFC1918 /8 IP space ranges and numbering their networks into them, or choosing their own arbitrary AS numbers.

[ Parent | on HN ]