News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruby 2.6 by ilrwbwrkhv on Monday December 24, 2018 @12:25PM (#18753107)
what bout clojure?
Re:Ruby 2.6 by anothergoogler on Monday December 24, 2018 @01:13PM (#18753369)
Clojure's stdlib is unintuitive, and `into` is the poster child.

It's easy to find what's available in Ruby: https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.3/Enumerable.html

Good luck with Clojure: https://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.core-api.html

Re:Ruby 2.6 by intertextuality on Monday December 24, 2018 @03:58PM (#18754240)
https://clojuredocs.org/ is what I always used. I dislike ruby's docs actually. Rust and Crystal have better UX design for their docs.
Re:Ruby 2.6 by slifin on Monday December 24, 2018 @02:10PM (#18753707)
Re:Ruby 2.6 by anothergoogler on Monday December 24, 2018 @04:28PM (#18754367)
I'm talking about the flat namespace.
Re:Ruby 2.6 by gleenn on Monday December 24, 2018 @07:06PM (#18754996)
While I understand the sentiment that all the functions aren't necessarily grouped as in OO languages, I think the Clojure functions are harder to group because they're more general. That's not necessarily the strongest argument, but it is so much more obvious in OO because you always have the object to group by compared to functional languages.