How low can you go? Ultra low latency Java in the real world [video]

Re:How low can you go? Ultra low latency Java in the real wo... by igouy on Saturday December 22, 2018 @11:24AM (#18741172)

> That's the source of the discrepancy on n-body…

You made that claim before, and I showed you the Rust n-body program "vector instructions using SIMD" contributed 5 months ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How low can you go? Ultra low latency Java in the real wo... by steveklabnik on Sunday December 23, 2018 @11:57AM (#18747073)

Which one of those is the right one? Number 5?

It shows 0.48 seconds, and 2 seconds, but https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... shows 13.27. Why isn't that one on the main page?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How low can you go? Ultra low latency Java in the real wo... by igouy on Sunday December 23, 2018 @01:03PM (#18747381)

> Which one of those is the right one? Number 5?

HN have now corrected the URL, as I asked.

> It shows 0.48 seconds, and 2 seconds

It shows 3 different workloads:

	 secs	         N
	 0.48	   500,000
	 2.01	 5,000,000
	20.09	50,000,000

> … but … shows 13.27…

Which we can see is the time for `n-body #2` at the largest workload:

	 secs	         N
	 0.54	   500,000
	 1.33	 5,000,000
	13.27	50,000,000

> Why isn't that one on the main page?

I don't know which you consider to be the "main page".

We can see that measurements for `n-body #2` are shown on both:

    faster/rust.html

and

    measurements/rust.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How low can you go? Ultra low latency Java in the real wo... by steveklabnik on Monday December 24, 2018 @09:49AM (#18752348)

Okay, I see now. It's about the three different measurements. Thank you!

[ Parent | on HN ]