News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by ddalex on Saturday December 22, 2018 @11:21AM (#18741159)
It seems to me that yourself miss a couple of points:

- the drones were flying high. Show me any sharpshooter that can shot down a highly agile and impredictible target at 200m high. Clay pigeons are shot at 60m on a very predictable trajectory, and even that requires a lot of skill and training.

- drones flying on preprogrammed path are impossible to intercept electronically, with the exception of GPS spoofing. Even that is difficult, never mind deploying GPS spoofers around the airport

- it would make the airplane operations impossible, so can't fly while the GPS spoofers are running, and when they're not running, there is drone flying

- the complexity of keeping drones in the air for long times (replacing batteries, field repairs, having spare parts) is not to be underestimated. This suggests a planned operation

Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by DBYCZ on Saturday December 22, 2018 @12:44PM (#18741564)
I wonder if it is possible to disable a drone with a barrage of powerful air vortices. This would solve the GPS/camera navigation problem without disabling aircraft systems, and it would prevent any collateral damage caused by launching projectiles in the air.

https://youtu.be/IN_N_J1yx-U?t=331

It would need to be vehicle mounted and automated to fire rapidly, but would be interesting to see in action. (And probably a lot of fun to operate)