Re:A New Largest-Known Prime Number
by throwawaymath on Saturday December 22, 2018 @09:10AM
(#18740627)
Why would anyone "squirm"? You have an issue with multiplying 0 factors to obtain 1, but you don't have a problem with multiplying a number by itself 0 times to obtain 1?
What the sibling response to my own is correct. It's just the empty set.
What the sibling response to my own is correct. It's just the empty set.