News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A New Largest-Known Prime Number by throwawaymath on Saturday December 22, 2018 @09:10AM (#18740627)
Why would anyone "squirm"? You have an issue with multiplying 0 factors to obtain 1, but you don't have a problem with multiplying a number by itself 0 times to obtain 1?

What the sibling response to my own is correct. It's just the empty set.

There are no comments on this comment yet.