Re:Introspected REST: An alternative to REST and GraphQL
by geezerjay on Saturday December 22, 2018 @03:37AM
(#18739652)
If the author can't be bothered to explain his idea in intelligible and clear terms, and also is unable to present a concrete example showcasing his proposed approach, then there is no point to waste time reading a manifesto as the creators themselves are incapable of leveraging the idea to produce any result.
Re:Introspected REST: An alternative to REST and GraphQL
by jondubois on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:29AM
(#18739812)
I also agree. If something cannot be explained in simple terms, then there is no way that it will be understood by enough people to actually trigger a change in collective behavior.
There needs to be some kind of marketing to give people an incentive to read the whole thing.
The marketing can be technical but it needs to be short and it needs to appeal to a common set of principles which people already have.
Re:Introspected REST: An alternative to REST and GraphQL
by megakid on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:38AM
(#18739854)
Came here to write this. Agree
Re:Introspected REST: An alternative to REST and GraphQL
by quickthrower2 on Saturday December 22, 2018 @05:04PM
(#18742720)
Yep I came here for the tldr to see if it is worth reading the rest of the article.
While I could spend significant time reading the entire manifesto, I’d appreciate a way to see up front if it’s worthwhile doing so.
The author has rejected similar calls before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18425581 but I truly think it would be beneficial to a lot of potential readers.