Re:Lottery-Like Prizes Coax Savings. What’s the Risk in Expa...
by hirsin on Friday December 21, 2018 @08:08PM
(#18738186)
Because that's not what it's saying? Safer sex means not getting HIV in this context. Similarly, not having unintended children would also be a benefit that does not say anything about forbidding people from raising children if they so choose.
Re:Lottery-Like Prizes Coax Savings. What’s the Risk in Expa...
by nyc_pizzadev on Friday December 21, 2018 @08:20PM
(#18738247)
Ya, sorry, I jumped to that conclusion based on an early statement.
Re:Lottery-Like Prizes Coax Savings. What’s the Risk in Expa...
by SOLAR_FIELDS on Friday December 21, 2018 @08:06PM
(#18738179)
Did you read the article? The author specifically is not referring to procreation, but rather risky sexual behavior for contracting HIV in Africa.
Re:Lottery-Like Prizes Coax Savings. What’s the Risk in Expa...
by nyc_pizzadev on Friday December 21, 2018 @08:19PM
(#18738240)
Not the whole thing, sorry, you are correct.
Whoa. I guess poor people should not be allowed to participate in the joys of family and child raising. How did this get by editorial?
Edit: at the end of the article, the author links sex to health. I apologize, I didn't make it that far. Would have been better to say heath education in the earlier statement...