Re:For First Time in More Than 20 Years, Copyrighted Works W...
by nicoburns on Thursday December 20, 2018 @09:46AM
(#18725291)
That's only a problem for Disney. The rest of the world gets to benefit from an explosion of creativity, and more available content.
I definitely support a short copyright period (say 10-20 years). Beyond that, as the original creators of the characters, any further 'official' content/stories created by them are likely to be popular if they are any good (and would be subject to their own copyright period). But if someone else takes on those characters and manages to produce great stories with them. Well fantastic, let's allow them to, and reward them for it.
Re:For First Time in More Than 20 Years, Copyrighted Works W...
by clort on Thursday December 20, 2018 @08:27AM
(#18724681)
Pretty sure that Disney will have trademarked Mickey Mouse and therefore a lack of copyright would be irrelevant anyway.
Re:For First Time in More Than 20 Years, Copyrighted Works W...
by Iv on Thursday December 20, 2018 @08:13AM
(#18724584)
Also there are a lot of franchises where, arguably, fans do a much better job than heirs.
I am bitter that Zelazny's heirs killed Amber RPG, one of the best of the time.
A lot has to be said on Dune and LOTR heirs as well. And don't get me started on Tintin, currently managed by the surviving second husband of Hergé's wife...
Re:For First Time in More Than 20 Years, Copyrighted Works W...
by goto11 on Thursday December 20, 2018 @10:16AM
(#18725540)
The concept of "canon" does not have anything to do with copyright.
Re:For First Time in More Than 20 Years, Copyrighted Works W...
by leephillips on Thursday December 20, 2018 @09:18AM
(#18725037)
I can think of two: the Casino Royale with Woody Allen, and Never Say Never Again. Any others?
Still I have little sympathy - it's hard to argue that endless Twilight fan-fiction did the franchise any harm. And there's plenty of non-canon James Bond films that have no impact on the main franchise.