News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by beefman on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @05:42PM (#18720575)
Even assuming only DAUs would pay $1000/year (Facebook has 1.5 billion of them) and a P/S ratio of 1 (which is conservative), the company would be worth $1.5T.

Edit: But we should consider something like Metcalfe's law, as pointed out by berbec

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18720468

Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by Eridrus on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @05:52PM (#18720687)
Companies cannot usually capture all the value they create.
Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by quadrangle on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @06:23PM (#18720948)
And yet companies like Facebook capture many orders of magnitude MORE value than they create.
Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by alanlamm on Thursday December 20, 2018 @12:10AM (#18722649)
The estimates in the study are for liberal arts college students (likely relatively Wwealthy vs US users as a whole), and if I’m not mistaken, US Facebook users have ARPU of as much as 10x other regions. If the WTP is also distributed like that, you could take your estima-te down by an order of magnitude even before network effects
Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by beefman on Thursday December 20, 2018 @12:34AM (#18722734)
> But we should consider something like Metcalfe's law, as pointed out by berbec

Giving, in this case, a value of $750B (at a P/S ratio of 1)

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Sum%5Bn+6.67e-7,+%7Bn,...

Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by bonoboTP on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @05:51PM (#18720674)
DAU probably means "daily active user" here.
Re:Estimating Value of Facebook by Paying Users to Stop Usin... by _underflow_ on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @08:10PM (#18721659)
Appreciate the clarification. Almost picked it up from context, but was still a little curious (searching the internet for an contextual acronym is never efficient)